Again, Google wrote the app, so even if Google thinks they wrote something because Roku forced them to write it, they’ll know they did it.
On the porn there is no mystery there. A few seconds with the docs I linked earlier shows: “You will not provide or use materials in connection with this Agreement, including within Your Properties, that Roku determines:” … “(c) constitute pornography”. Easy-peasy. I leave it to you to find where your isms/ists are required of channel developers, since you have more interest in that than I do. At least it’s handy to have the docs before contacting Google, so if they claim that Roku made them do it, you can ask them to point out which clause in the agreement required that.
Sorry, I thought I was having fun with you on all these ists! I really thought forcing Roku to be more pantisocratist was pretty good!
Banned but back. Because why not?
