VA1DER
All Dolby decoders can (re)encode to the Dolby capabilities level of the decoder (e.g. DMAT 2.x PCM/Atmos, DMAT 2.x PCM, DD+/Atmos, DD+, DD) and below & of the detected/configured device (e.g. DMAT 2.x PCM/Atmos, DMAT 2.x PCM, DD+/Atmos, DD+, DD) and below - this is by Dolby spec/requirement (assuming a certified Dolby decoder in usage), and has always been true, so it sort of "goes without saying".
Yes, Roku could put that in the marketing/specs, but none of their competitors/etc devices' with Dolby decoders do (e.g. FireTV, Android TV, Google TV, TVs, etc), and some of them are far more detailed in their audio specs, so I wouldnt hold that against Roku, though a clear statement that it has both Dolby Atmos-level decoder & Dolby passthrough capabilities should be sufficient (better would be to list specifically which Dolby/DTS codecs/formats each model supports; best would be the unicorn scenario of listing all the input codecs/formats vs output codecs/formats and all transcoding/conversion scenarios in a nice huge table/chart).
You/others (and myself: though I have Atmos-capable HTS setups, I also have (and maintain for others) legacy DD-only HTS/etc setups) arent a "dinosaur": there is a much much larger installed base of DD-only devices than there are DD+ (and higher) devices, so compatibility exists for that reason alone - the difference between Roku and its competitors is that most Roku models lack Dolby decoders (passthrough only), whereas most/all competitors models include Dolby decoders (no passthrough), giving competitors an advantage when it comes to fuller 5.1 (DD+/DD) compatibility, though a disadvantage when it comes to 5.1 passthrough capabilities.