"belltown" wrote:
I'm not sure what their rationale was in splitting up their documents in this way, but it makes it incredibly hard to find anything. [...] I've given up hope that Roku will listen to their developers' feedback. If they'd been listening, there would be real full-sized PDF documents by now that we could download, like there used to be, instead of links on a web site that isn't always accessible. I'm sure that as well-meaning as some of them are, they just don't have the resources, and are too busy working on their next big thing. End of rant.
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by [simpler means]"
I often have to repeat myself that when dealing with things Roku.
The move from PDF to wiki made sense, considering the lack of discipline in updating the documentation (cue the "release notes" that may or may not be updated months after release). It ensures we have the latest documentation without a formal generation/release cycle for PDFs - decreasing delay from weeks and months to days (technically, minutes even). It also makes it easy for RokuMarkn and RokuKC, when reading about minor issues with the docs, to fix them on-the fly, shall they be in the mood. Also, if i remember, Confluence has a self-service feature somewhere to generate PDFs from selection of pages, i hope that still works.
The recent document chopping to pieces makes no sense, however. There is a fine balance, a right middle-ground of how big information pages should be - and the new size is too fine of a grind indeed. It's not a piece meal of info - instead it's a puree, a chopped liver. I wonder what possessed the technical writer.
But you know what? We should speak up, like you just did. Roku employees are only human and cannot read minds. Yes, i saw documents got chopped to pieces couple of months ago, it bothered me but i said nothing. Anybody else?
Which option do you lean towards, people - "chunky" or "smoothie"?