"RokuMarkn" wrote:
A feature like this could have serious consequences, by increasing the average power usage of the TV. For example, it might cause it to fail Energy Star certification, which would be a non-starter. Even if it didn't, I think the decision makers would want to hear a pretty compelling use case to justify doing something like this.
The use case is:
being able to turn RokuTV "on" over IP, the way it can be turned off already. A forward step in the "connected home" trend.When they discover the power button in teh "Roku" remote app can be used to turn off the TV but not to power it up, the typical user reaction is:
[spoiler=WAT:5wvoaokg]
[/spoiler:5wvoaokg] - i.e. is counter- "principle of least astonishment".
A "proper" implementation may require some variety of Wake-on-LAN, be it wireless or wired-only. But how much energy would a RokuTV consume with screen off and working LAN, i wonder? (Not being a hardware guy,) it's my belief TV sets stay in sleep mode when turned off anyway, because of listening to the IR remote sensor. Maybe LAN adaptor does not consume much - or does it? (It can be an opt-in setting, as WillEV proposed).