Hello: I did search this community to see if anyone had posted this question. I've been given a 2011 LG 42LV4400 HD TV. About to be a first-time Roku user and seeking a Roku device to enable ability to access streaming services I subscribe to AND mirror Apple content occasionally. I do not have a cable TV package. I have searched the Roku Community and other resources and am a bit confused on Roku's compatibility with a 2011 HD TV (not smart) with some users seemingly having issues, others seemingly fine. I am looking at the Roku Express (do not need bells/whistles of voice command etc.). Any feedback for this new-to-Roku user for a 2011 LG HD TV (which does have the HDMI inout)???? Will Express be functional?
Thanks in advance, grateful to be able to view movies outside my 13" laptop ;0)
As long as the TV has an available functioning HDMI input port, any Roku will be compatible with it.
My advice would be to NOT get the bottom of the line budget Roku non-4K Express, currently model #3960. Go at least for the Roku Express 4K, which is a much more capable unit. Even if you don't have a 4K set, it will work fine with an HD set and you'll be prepared should you get a 4K set in the future. Compared to the bottom of the line Express, it has more memory, a faster processor, and perhaps the most important, dual band WiFi that can connect to your router in both the 2.4 and 5GHz Wifi bands (the low end Express only has the older 2.4 GHz band).
I'm sure you're aware that an ancient device like the LG TV mentioned does NOT support 4K UHD content, current surround formats or frame rates so you're doing yourself a disservice. I have the sense your laptop is Mac and designed with a very high resolution Retina display too. And while I can appreciate being gifted a larger screen, its low resolution and lack of features may be disappointing when using the Roku.
I mention these things in case you have high expectations. I'm a long time Roku user and film buff and love the immersive experience of 4K/Dolby Vision and surround sound formats. Even an entry level 4K TV will be FAR superior to the LG you mention. Whatever you choose, make sure its future proof since tech advances regularly.
Rokus work fine with my 2008 Samsung and can be made to work with far older (pre-HDMI) TVs with a converter. HDMI is just video and audio – no real “smartness” travels across it.
For a 42” display at typical across-the-room viewing distances, I think you’ll be fine with an HD TV. My 27” computer monitor is 4K and that makes a big difference, but since it is viewed at arm’s length, it has the apparent size of a 120” TV at a typical family room viewing distance. That said, the 4K+ Roku adds so little to the price, and comes with other benefits, so I would get the slightly more expensive Roku now and MAYBE worry about a fancier TV in the future.
As long as the TV has an available functioning HDMI input port, any Roku will be compatible with it.
My advice would be to NOT get the bottom of the line budget Roku non-4K Express, currently model #3960. Go at least for the Roku Express 4K, which is a much more capable unit. Even if you don't have a 4K set, it will work fine with an HD set and you'll be prepared should you get a 4K set in the future. Compared to the bottom of the line Express, it has more memory, a faster processor, and perhaps the most important, dual band WiFi that can connect to your router in both the 2.4 and 5GHz Wifi bands (the low end Express only has the older 2.4 GHz band).
I'm sure you're aware that an ancient device like the LG TV mentioned does NOT support 4K UHD content, current surround formats or frame rates so you're doing yourself a disservice. I have the sense your laptop is Mac and designed with a very high resolution Retina display too. And while I can appreciate being gifted a larger screen, its low resolution and lack of features may be disappointing when using the Roku.
I mention these things in case you have high expectations. I'm a long time Roku user and film buff and love the immersive experience of 4K/Dolby Vision and surround sound formats. Even an entry level 4K TV will be FAR superior to the LG you mention. Whatever you choose, make sure its future proof since tech advances regularly.
Rokus work fine with my 2008 Samsung and can be made to work with far older (pre-HDMI) TVs with a converter. HDMI is just video and audio – no real “smartness” travels across it.
For a 42” display at typical across-the-room viewing distances, I think you’ll be fine with an HD TV. My 27” computer monitor is 4K and that makes a big difference, but since it is viewed at arm’s length, it has the apparent size of a 120” TV at a typical family room viewing distance. That said, the 4K+ Roku adds so little to the price, and comes with other benefits, so I would get the slightly more expensive Roku now and MAYBE worry about a fancier TV in the future.
#Jonathan, appreciate your feedback, thank you