"storydriven" wrote:
Is it a more overall look to make sure that it works and the user interface/experience makes sense?
Yes, in the initial review, that is what we do, the channel review process we look for things like:
* Typos, grammar and graphical errors
* Unnecessary things that make life difficult for users
* Obvious program crashes
* Things that say "Resume" when nothing has yet been watched, or content viewing is complete
* Star ratings that aren't really reflecting a rating system on server
If the channel passes initial review, we then send to QA, who will go down a list and check off UI requirements, not all of which may be vital or relevant to your particular channel, so after QA we usually take a look at the channel again in light of QA feedback and determine if there is any real reason to hold publication.
- Joel