"BradC" wrote:
the channel store is a mess.
last time I brought this up, my top selling channels got suddenly moved to the very bottom of the list, even though 2 were on the top selling paid list at the time.
I agree it's a mess and RokuCo's web-dev team does not compare favorably to the core developers. I am looking for an English phrase and so far found the somewhat crass "
ass can't cash". And what i mean by that is they re-designed the web site for "responsive design" in irresponsible manner. Someone is learning-on-the-job there and we the internet users of the world are their guinea pigs. Oh wait - here is another one "their eyes are bigger than they can stomach".
I remember you questioning the different order of channels in the web vs the player stores, as well as the variation between different player models - and i thought the explanation someone Roku* gave made sense, that each line of players uses their own stats, based on how downloads go for that model - where the web store uses aggregate stats.
But i doubt the Co would have maliciously downgraded your channels, it seems out of character. HOWEVER, this is why it is important the rating/sorting to be
fair and transparent - so that good, prolific developers like you @BradC do not get alienated!
Back from the general to the specific: so yeah, when i see that sort-by-rating does not work, that's depressing. Even if i were to get 5-out-of-5 rating, i'd still be at the end of the list.