Channel Issues & Questions

Help & troubleshooting for channels on your Roku device, including adding/removing channels, logging in to, authenticating, or activating a channel, channel-specific playback issues, assistance contacting channel publishers to report issues, and adjusting channel-specific settings.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
bknabe
Level 12

Re: Roku either adds Peacock or lose me as a customer/promoter

Jump to solution

@NokuFooYou wrote:

As far as I am concerned, Noku has a history of dispicable business practices  In my case, this dates back to their inability to maintain the SlingPlayer App, even as they were advertising in prominently on the Noku site itself.  As far as I am concerned, advertising something is an implicit contract to support that product for a reasonable length of time.  Fire TV supports SlingPlayer, Noku does not.  And they dropped support wothout notice, poof.

In my view Noku has no technology and no value, just a Broadcom chip and memory in a plastic box.  They are a leach trying to profit off my subscription to HBO.  I have as much sympathy for their position as I would for a PC maker trying to charge for me to run an application on my PC.  I paid for their platform, but it's not a platform, it's an excuse for disgraceful business practices.  I thought they would be an honest, neutral platform, but they are the bottom feeder of the industry.


From what I can tell from an admittedly brief google search, it looks like Roku made some changes to the platform that effected multiple apps, and Slingbox was one that decided not to make changes in order to stay on Roku. It also appears that for about a 10 month period around that time they went dark and didn't respond to queries from their customers. 

And if you're really complaining about despicable business practices, you need to do some research on Warner and Comcast.

0 Kudos
Frobozz02
Level 7

Re: HBO max and peacock tv app

Jump to solution

I pay content providers for the right to stream the content they offer. I pay for the ROKU device so I can have the ability to stream that content. Now ROKU wants in on the money i pay for ther rights to content! Fine,  then ROKU should let the content provider in on some of the money they get for the devices! ROKU is changing their position in the business to make more money. This alone does not upset me. When they cause me frustration, THEN i get upset.

  I understand ROKU made money for subscriptions through the ROKU store. But  that was side money and it was a convenience for us users. 

 

This is an INCONVENIENCE!!!

HardKnoxfox
Level 7

Re: Where's Peacock and HBO Max?

Jump to solution

Where did you find that source?!? 
ive been reading the CNET articles for weeks asking about Peacock.  
In 2008, Netflix was using mail service. Netflix dude got with the Roku dude. Because the Roku guy had the first TiVo, so they got together to bring a small affordable box to your tv that would stream video on demand. Launched in 2007. Now Netflix and chill is pop culture vocabulary as a result of this success. 

in the meantime Hulu went on the Internet for phones and computers as a beta version. Then Hulu went to Roku to stream on Roku platform. 
Then it got super popular. Roku was the best for streaming devices, because it was an unknown and not connected to any other service. Chrome cast was a google product, Firestick was Amazon... it was kinda confusing for people that didn’t understand WiFi streaming. (A lot of them still don’t)

Then Hulu offered live tv and movies and that kinda one upped Netflix. And it became the greatest thing for tv ever(in my opinion)

Hulu is owned by Disney. Hulu is doing so great... but NO not enough.. let’s make a Disney channel and they’ll pay more!! Disney is partners with NBC universal under the Comcast umbrella.. so they said NO , HULU is bringing in billions, Disney.. they will pay billions!! MORE!! Let’s make Peacock ( which basically has 80% library that Hulu already has) so they can get more. 

So when Roku met with Peacocks the SAME companies that have been on Roku for a decade , not just don’t want to pay Roku... they want ROKU TO PAY THEM to be on Roku. 
Ridiculous. 
roku devices in every homes, smart TVs.. 

I guess they’re gonna have to make a peacock tv 

I don’t know 

fluke
Level 13

Re: Roku either adds Peacock or lose me as a customer/promoter

Jump to solution

@NokuFooYou wrote:

As far as I am concerned, Noku has a history of dispicable business practices  In my case, this dates back to their inability to maintain the SlingPlayer App, even as they were advertising in prominently on the Noku site itself.  As far as I am concerned, advertising something is an implicit contract to support that product for a reasonable length of time.  Fire TV supports SlingPlayer, Noku does not.  And they dropped support wothout notice, poof.

In my view Noku has no technology and no value, just a Broadcom chip and memory in a plastic box.  They are a leach trying to profit off my subscription to HBO.  I have as much sympathy for their position as I would for a PC maker trying to charge for me to run an application on my PC.  I paid for their platform, but it's not a platform, it's an excuse for disgraceful business practices.  I thought they would be an honest, neutral platform, but they are the bottom feeder of the industry.


Roku never maintained a SlingPlayer app.  If you look carefully when installing an app, the Roku Streaming Store states the name of the company publishing/maintaining the app.  There are three apps that Roku themselves directly published: The Roku Channel, Roku Media Player, Roku Tips & Tricks.  The SlingPlayer app was published and maintained by a different company that selected to stop providing it for Roku.

In terms of advertising something the product no longer provides, I agree that is frustrating.  Once you find a company that never does that, let me know.  As far as the Amazon Fire TV products, they continued to advertise their products as having a YouTube app even during the time period they had been banned.  In fact, their customers lost access to YouTube due to actions by Amazon themselves (banning Chromecast and Nest products from Amazon).  Google had warned them for months that access to YouTube would be removed before doing so.  Despite the warning, Amazon never changed what their fraudulent claims of what the product provided even when Amazon's own knowledgebase admitted YouTube was not available.  So, based on your own criteria, it appears Fire TV is out as well.

As to the Broadcom processor used in previous Roku devices and other ARM processors used in current Roku products, these are just as capable (if not more so) than the MediaTek processor in the Fire TV stick.  Once you add on top of Foxconn's processor used by the Fire stick that Fire OS is more bloated and heavy weight than Roku OS, it just doesn't feel as polished a product as Roku.

As to your claim Roku is leach subscriptions from HBO, can you please provide citations to your sources?  This seems to be a frequently reiterated claim by newly created Roku community forum account much like your own created on "07-31-2020."  It might make the claim seem a little less like a misinformation campaign if there was a credible source stated.

Dsnay
Level 8

Re: Add HBO Max & Peacock immediately or reimburse me for all 3 of my Roku devices.

Jump to solution

I would love to see Roku reply to all of these requests for services to be added. I would also like AT&T to respond to requests on their site. We’re all waiting.

0 Kudos
atc98092
Community Streaming Expert

Re: Add HBO Max & Peacock immediately or reimburse me for all 3 of my Roku devices.

Jump to solution

@mojo13 wrote:

I bought Roku devices because of your promise to be a neutral service, clearly that is no longer the case.


Roku has never made any such promise. Yes, it's frustrating for users that want those two channels. But if you check all the different streaming players available, you will find that there is no one player that supports "everything". You will find that many people use more than one streaming device, with the Shield, Apple TV, Fire TV and Roku as the four main players. The Shield comes closest to being the one in all, but even it falls short for some users with some streaming providers. 

Dan

Roku Community Streaming Expert

Help others find this answer and click "Accept as Solution."
If you appreciate my answer, maybe give me a Kudo.

I am not a Roku employee, just another user.
0 Kudos
FredCDobbs
Level 8

Another Lost Customer

Jump to solution

This is ridiculous.  I have been an HBO subscriber for over 30 years.  I bought a Roku Ultra to stream MY selection of channels for MY entertainment choices.  Now this standoff between Roku and HBO is interfering with my ability as a Customer to enjoy what I paid for.

Roku, be on notice - read this thread: you are about to lose significant market-share IF YOU DO NOT IMMEDIATELY SIGN A DEAL TO GET HBO AND OTHER SERVICES BACK ON.  I have already researched how to get back to my regular viewing habits using a Chromebox.  You have about 1 Week before I add Roku to my 'Junk: Never Purchase Or Use Again' list.

JohnnyJumpup
Level 7

Re: First HBO Max, Now Peacock... Roku needs to be more flexible

Jump to solution

I got 2 Tivo4Ks and love it!! I have HBO max and I have turned off my Rokus. 

 

hb_whiteman
Level 8

Re: Roku either adds Peacock or lose me as a customer/promoter

Jump to solution

@Yourselves6 wrote:

Hahahaha

Get **bleep**ed Roku


😂🤣😂 Short, sweet & to the point! 👏

JT519
Level 7

Another angry soon to be ex roku user

Jump to solution

Just here to complain about the HBO Max and Peacock bull. I have 3 roku devices and it's ridiculous not being able to watch my shows and channels on these once beloved devices. Might as well just go back to freakin cable... HBO will get customers regardless. I see Roku losing customers. 

0 Kudos