Update: when Bud Light made bad decions recently, both the marketing director Alissa Heinersheid and her boss Daniel Blake were pushed out the door of the company. We don't know if their are on paid leave but the backlash is serious. The parent company lost $17 billion in market cap.
Roku will likely lose some of it's key management as a result of their latest stunt ... let's hope their survive the backlash as Roku has been a good company up until the day they started manipulating key features for which helped sell their devises.
If Haystack news is removed as a Screensaver, I will personally be compelled to demand local retails stores from selling there streaming devices and any televisions equipped with Roku.
These posts need to go far and wise so that Roku understands the importance of treating their customers with honor and respect.
As someone said above, many of us don't want fish scrolling across our screens, we want useful information on our screens. We can get a fish tank in our homes for fish. Out televisions are for content we consider to be important.
Haystack news delivers quality content and if Roku is not about understanding our needs, we need to stand up to their nonsense. They will stumble just as Bud Light stumbled.
The news will soon come out about the details of which management were involved with Roku's bad decisions. People will not be satisfied with a simple apology. They will want to see those managers removed from their positions because they lack good judgment.
If Roku has bad management making such important decisions, investors will feel their is instability in the company.
Roku should act fast to assure everyone that their poor decision to remove Haystack News Screensaver has been rectified and that the culprits within Roku have been permanently removed.